Projecting School-Age Enrollment:
Use of the Cohort Survival Technique
By Peter K. Ashton & Mary Ann Buescher
Innovation & Information Consultants, Inc.
Concord, MA
Introduction
Rapid growth in school age populations as a result of the maturation of
the baby-boomer generation has had far-reaching effects on school
budgets, curriculum decisions, space issues, and school construction
plans. In Massachusetts, school age enrollment has increased markedly
in many communities in the last decade, prompting a flurry of new
school construction proposals as well as decisions relating to services
for children with special needs and children who are learning English
as a second language. School administrators and policy makers require
accurate and reliable estimates of future school populations in order
to make informed decisions on such issues and to plan properly for the
future. Our methodology and the projections we have developed for
various school districts have served as the basis for several
successful new construction projects as well budgeting decisions
regarding influx of various types of special needs students. In this
paper we present a model that provides reliable enrollment projections
and points to the critical factors that drive changes in enrollment.
Determinants of School-Age Enrollment
A number of different factors contribute to changes in enrollment for
grades kindergarten through 12. Such factors include the following:
 |
Trends in population |
 |
Birth rates |
 |
Migration in and out of a city or town |
 |
Average household size |
 |
School retention rate |
 |
New housing construction |
 |
School policies |
 |
General economic conditions |
Population trends have a direct and immediate impact on school
enrollment. Some communities have witnessed population increases of
20–30 percent during the 1990s, and in those communities one naturally
expects that enrollment will be on the rise. Communities in the western
and southwestern suburbs of Boston have witnessed such rapid rates of
population growth. Given this large influx of people, the number of
school age children has clearly increased. Birth rates also dictate
school-age enrollment. Birth rates are driven in large part by the age
distribution of females living in a particular community as well as the
average age at which women decide to have children. A critical element
in projecting elementary enrollment beyond a 5-year time horizon is
estimating accurately future birth rates.
Migration of families in or out of town can also have a distinct
impact on future enrollment. To the extent that a city or town becomes
increasingly attractive (due to low property values or taxes, high
quality schools, or other desired services), in-migration will increase
enrollment and vice-versa. Also certain towns go through periods of
increased housing turnover driven by "empty-nesters" moving out and new
families with school-age children moving in that also impacts
enrollment. Average household size is another important variable.
Generally household size has remained fairly constant in recent years,
but in some communities, the average family size has actually
increased, thereby implying increased enrollment. The rate at which
children remain in a given school as opposed to going to private
school, known as the school retention rate, can also influence
enrollment. The creation of charter schools in some districts as well
as the attractiveness of certain private schools has led to changes in
school retention rates in some districts. Finally, new housing
construction, general economic conditions, and the establishment of
various school policies, e.g., class size, can all have an impact on
enrollment. Many, however, overemphasize the role of new housing
construction on enrollment without understanding the importance of
in-migration and housing turnover as drivers of enrollment increases.
Methods for Projecting Enrollment: The Cohort-Survival Method
Various methods might be employed to forecast enrollment changes. If
one thinks of future enrollment as a function of past trends, one could
use historical trends as a place to start. Such trends could be
extrapolated to predict future enrollment. Statistical analysis also
could be employed to estimate future enrollment based on changes in
certain critical variables. However, although these and other
techniques have been used to predict demographic trends including
future enrollment, the method most widely employed and accepted for
predicting future school enrollment is the "cohort-survival" method.
This method is considered the most reliable. It captures the key
determinants of enrollment, yet also allows for changes in historical
trends, is relatively simple to apply and the data requirements are
reasonable and usually easily fulfilled.
The major assumption underlying the cohort survival method is that
the past to a large extent is a reasonable predictor of the future:
that is, given the number of births, the net effect of all other
factors (migration, policies, retention rates, new home construction,
etc.) remain in relative balance.
The cohort-survival method requires the calculation of the ratio of the number
of children in one grade in one year compared to the number of children
who "survive" the year and enroll in the next grade the following year.
Fluctuations in such data from year to year create a pattern over time
from which an average rate may be calculated to project enrollment. For
example, if over a period of years, an average of 95 percent of the
enrollment in grade 2 goes on to grade 3, and if 100 children are now
enrolled in grade 2, the method (without any modifications) will
predict that there will be 96 children in grade 3 next year. Clearly an
important aspect of this computation is deciding the appropriate time
period over which to compute the average grade-to-grade ratio. In
cities and towns with rapidly changing demographic trends, shorter time
frames are usually better, whereas in communities with more stagnant
trends, longer time periods are preferred.
Forecasts for successive years must take as their starting points an
estimate of the number of children entering kindergarten. These
estimates are made by methods similar to those described above. An
average birth to kindergarten survival rate is obtained by comparing
known kindergarten enrollments to the number of births five years
earlier. One computes this "birth to kindergarten" ratio over some
relevant period of time and then applies this ratio to the number of
births five years previously to derive a kindergarten enrollment
projection for the current year. For example, if the average birth to
kindergarten ratio was found to be 120 percent, a reasonable estimate
for kindergarten enrollment would be the number of births (say 50)
times 120 percent (60).
The cohort survival method is a function of two key variables, (1)
the number of births, and (2) the calculated survival rates. As noted
above, projections of elementary enrollment are limited to five years
at most with actual birth data. Beyond five years, the number of births
must be estimated, which leads to greater potential for error. Various
techniques do exist for projecting birth rates and can be applied to
generate elementary grade enrollment projections further into the
future, but these must be viewed with a reduced level of confidence.
Figure 1 shows the cohort-survival method, including the birth
projection com-ponent of the model. Births are to be a function of the
number of women in a community of childbearing age and the number of
births. Births are projected based on age-specific rates of birth and
the number of females projected to be entering peak childbearing years.
In- and out-migration of this element of the population must also be
examined to accurately forecast births. Comparison of forecasted birth
rates with actual birth rates have suggested that our model is
relatively accurate in predicting birth rates.1

By its very nature, the cohort-survival method captures the effects
of changes in population, migration, new housing construction, and the
other determinants of enrollment. The method relies on historical data
to establish proper ratios, but evaluation of other data, such as data
on new housing permits, changes in population and household size may be
used to determine whether the ratios should be adjusted, or whether a
longer or shorter historical time horizon is more appropriate. For
example, in one community for which we developed enrollment data, new
housing starts accelerated over a five-year period, then declined to
historical levels. The ratios, particularly the birth to kindergarten
ratio increased markedly in response to the increase in new housing
construction, and then dropped off again. Unless one expected another
peak of new construction similar to the one witnessed earlier, it would
be erroneous to give too much weight to those years in computing the
average ratios.2
Reliability of the Cohort-Survival Method
The reliability of the cohort-survival method is related to both the
number of years one is projecting as well as the relative volatility of
the historical data. Projections covering five years or less,
especially at the elementary level, tend to be more reliable than
projections going out more than five years. In addition, in some
communities the numbers of births, population, household size, and net
migration rates have held relatively steady which increases the
reliability of the results. In other communities, one or more such
variables exhibit extreme variation leading to less reliable results.
Validation tests may be performed on the enrollment forecasts by
reviewing in subsequent years the relative accuracy of the projections,
as well as by analyzing the factors that may have contributed to the
variation from the forecast. We have regularly performed validation
tests for one community and have found that the error rate in the
enrollment forecasts across all grades has never exceeded 5 percent,
although within certain grades it may be as high as 10 percent. This
higher error rate almost always occurs at kindergarten or 1st grade and
is due to two factors. First, there are a greater number of years
between observed data points in computing the birth to kindergarten
ratios than the grade-to-grade ratios and thus more chance for error
(e.g., shifts on migration patterns). Second, parents have some
discretion in making the choice of when to first send their children to
a school district and this can affect the ratios as well as shift over
time.3 For example, some parents may prefer to hold their children back a year, or even send their children to private kindergarten.
Nevertheless, the cohort-survival technique with the modifications
we have added to account for community specific factors has proven to
be a reliable method for projecting school enrollment populations.
Figure 2 shown below demonstrates this by comparing actual enrollment
for one community compared with projections we developed several years
ago.

Other Applications
This model may also be applied to specific circumstances to estimate
enrollment for certain subgroups or programs of a school population.
For example, enrollment projections may be developed for children with
special needs and children who are learning English as a second
language. We apply the same Cohort-Survival method, but rather than
treat an entire grade as a single cohort, we divide a grade into
separate programs and develop program specific estimates of future
enrollment based on historical data, grade progression ratios, and
other relevant information. In one community that was undergoing
substantial ethnic changes, we projected the rate of increase of
bilingual population based not only on historical data, but also
demographic trends in that community and surrounding communities.
Endnotes
| 1. |
 |
For
three towns that we examined over the last five years, we were within
10 percent of accurately predicting births in each year. |
| 2. |
 |
There
are two ways to handle this problem. One is to ignore those years
completely in calculating the average, or second, one might select a
relatively long time period over which to compute the average, thus
diluting the impact of the "peak" years. |
| 3. |
 |
Obviously,
changing the enrollment cutoff date for kindergarten can also have a
significant effect and must be accounted for in evaluating birth to
kindergarten ratios. |

|
 |

|